This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 status problem
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 status problem
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 status problem
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon May 15 18:21:19 CEST 2023
Hi, On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 04:23:53PM +0200, James Kennedy wrote: > > I do not see why this would be violating policy if the outgoing resource > > holder states "I do not want to transfer anything", in a format that is > > appropriate for the circumstances - notably, "whatever happens to me > > in the next months, do not believe anything else I might be forced to say". > > What should the RIPE NCC do if that member later submits a > policy-compliant transfer request, during their previously requested > "transfer lockdown" period? Does the "transfer lock" mechanism > override the Transfer Policy? What is unclear about a clear statement of will that says "ignore everything I am going to say about this for the next 6 months"? There is no leeway for interpretation or doubt here. > Seems needlessly messy to me and far too open to interpretation. I > support the idea of clearly documenting a Transfer Lockdown mechanism > in the Transfer Policy. > > "Any legitimate resource holder is allowed to transfer complete or > partial blocks of address space or number resources (IPv4, IPv6 and AS > Numbers) that were previously allocated or assigned to them by the > RIPE NCC or otherwise through the Regional Internet Registry (RIR) > system." https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-682#2-0-transfers-within-the-ripe-ncc-service-region Yes, *allowed*, so the NCC can not deny a resource holder the right *if he wants so*. But if he clearly states "I do not want to excercise this right for the next 6 months" this is a matter of consenting adults, and contractual matters. Amend the SSAC if needed to cover this case (this I'd actually find somewhat logical). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20230515/5b930374/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 status problem
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 status problem
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]