[ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 status problem

Hi,

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 03:53:56PM +0200, denis walker wrote:
> The Transfer policy says that resource CAN be
> transferred. 

This implies the will of the outgoing and incoming resource holders.

There is nothing in the policy that says "a resource can be transferred
*against the will* of the current resource holder".

So, the proposed lockdown is an explicit statement of the resource
holder "it is not my wish to transfer any of my resources in the next
6 months".

I do not see why this would be violating policy if the outgoing resource
holder states "I do not want to transfer anything", in a format that is
appropriate for the circumstances - notably, "whatever happens to me
in the next months, do not believe anything else I might be forced to say".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20230515/48d8481a/attachment.sig>