[ncc-services-wg] 2023-03 status problem

Hi,

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 12:10:22PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
> As the authors were in a bit of a difficult position. The chairs won't move this policy proposal forward as there was no feedback during the discussion phase.

I would argue that it's *their* job to solicit feedback in time for
the deadline, not yours, and also it's *their* job to ask their WG what
it wants.

I think this is a spectacular failure and should have never entered
the PDP, but if at all, it should have been APWG as Denis pointed out.

Besides, I've stated often enough that I support the idea, so, no, I
will not satisfy bureaucratics here by repeating it once more.  Let the
proposal fail if the lawyers want it that way.

Gert Doering
        -- policy wonk
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20230515/3f066d0b/attachment.sig>