[ncc-services-wg] Transfer Voluntary Lock 2023-03

as long as the PI holders can change the sponsoring LIR, I think that is
fine.

Arash

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 13:15, Olha Sira <vasylevych at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think  also that it is a bad idea  to let a LIR push the Transfer Lock
> button on behalf of PI holders.
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 21:47, Max Tulyev <maxtul at netassist.ua> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 03.06.23 18:44, Михайло Кононихін пише:
>> > There are 24 mentions of the phrase "resource holder". Doesn't it mean
>> > any resource holder, not just LIRs? I believe it includes organizations
>> > with PI.
>>
>> I agree.
>> But I don't see the way how it (will be) implemented technically.
>>
>> I think let LIRs be able to push the button for PI holders is a bad idea.
>>
>
>
>
>>
>> >
>> > BTW, PI resources are easier to protect: you can transfer them to any
>> > organization, don't need LIR. Transfer locks for 2 years.
>> >
>> Yes, a bit easier. You don't need a LIR for receiving company.
>>
>> --
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change
>> your subscription options, please visit:
>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change
> your subscription options, please visit:
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20230606/76fdbab5/attachment.html>