This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Proposal: optimized rev-DNS operations
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: optimized rev-DNS operations
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: optimized rev-DNS operations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard (Network Ability Ltd)
nick at netability.ie
Fri Oct 25 15:21:13 CEST 2019
Kurt Kayser wrote on 25/10/2019 13:39: > Since the IPv6-blocks are quite large, one member might be interested > towards areas that have active reverse requests coming in (but those are > only visible up to the RIPE NCC servers, if they are not delegated for > *all* IPv6 address space, which I doubt will ever happen. > > If they would have a means to know those top-areas they could > (optionally) start analyzing and a delegation process and deliver > answers for such addresses. but is it really the RIPE NCC's business to chase this down for resource holders? If the resource holder wants to know, they can get the dns delegated and investigate this themselves. If they don't want to know, that's kinda their business. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: optimized rev-DNS operations
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: optimized rev-DNS operations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]