[ncc-services-wg] Proposal: optimized rev-DNS operations

Hello Jim,

et al,

thanks for your reply. And I figure also some misinterpretation of my
intentions. Truely, I need be clearer.

Let me take one step back and officially ask the RIPE NCC to provider
solid figures for the following statistics (hence I base my proposal on
them and until now it was just an assumption):

Total number to reverse_DNS requests for RIPE NCC addressblocks for a
given timeframe hitting NCC servers (say for a test: 1 week).

    a. Ratio of successful NS replies to correctly delegated zones
(independently if they might be correctly setup) of our members

    b. vs. replies that are not (yet) delegated zones (and yes, you were
correct, they are NOT called lame-delegations) - which are the ones I am
actually interested in for the proposal.

    c. vs. any other (say errors or RR that won't play a role here
currently)

I am also happy to take this proposal discussion the DNS-WG, but at the
end I intended to let the RIPE NCC deliver an additional service to
their members.

Best regards,

Kurt Kayser