This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: 2018-05 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Legal Address of Internet Number Resource Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: 2018-05 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Legal Address of Internet Number Resource Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: 2018-05 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Legal Address of Internet Number Resource Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fearghas Mckay
fearghas at gmail.com
Thu Oct 11 15:56:40 CEST 2018
> On 11 Oct 2018, at 09:50, Andreas Frackowiak <af at ins.de> wrote: > > You could put your lawyer in there (ofc you have to pay him yourself), > or yourself, or nothing (the "legal-c" is optional and not mandatory). > At least that was my idea. The benefit of the contact should be paid for by the beneficiary which is not me, hence the cost recovery, which is already part of most intercept regimes. f
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: 2018-05 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Legal Address of Internet Number Resource Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: 2018-05 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Legal Address of Internet Number Resource Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]