This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: Get a warrant or direct request ?
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: Get a warrant or direct request ?
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: Get a warrant or direct request ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Oct 10 15:52:12 CEST 2018
> On 10 Oct 2018, at 14:33, Marcolla, Sara Veronica <Sara.Marcolla at europol.europa.eu> wrote: > > I am a bit puzzled by this statement. If you only have the information concerning the tech support of said company, you would invest time and effort in sending the request to that country - where they would turn down the request as the company is not legally incorporated in such country, but in another one, at which point you would have to do all the process again, losing time and wasting resources. Just because you could not immediately pinpoint a geographical jurisdiction. Sara, we seem to be talking at cross purposes. I was answering the OP’s question about what happens when overseas law enforcement knocks on the door of the NCC (or some other registry). To answer your question, law enforcement obviously wouldn’t or shouldn’t send an MLAT request to the wrong jurisdiction. Just like they wouldn’t submit an extradition request (say) to the wrong court. That’s common sense.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: Get a warrant or direct request ?
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] @EXT: RE: Get a warrant or direct request ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]