[ncc-services-wg] legal adress

Hello Nik,

and NCC-Services-WG,

I fully support your view on this topic.

Especially the statements marked in bold.

Regards, Kurt


Am 10.10.2018 um 12:34 schrieb Nik Soggia:
> Il 10/10/18 11:23, ROBINOT Stephane DCPJ SDLC ha scritto:
>
>> Speaking about sole trader, if i understand well your point and go
>> beyond, the name by itself might also be considerated as a personal
>> data as it is also a way to identify the person.
>
> We should be extremely careful about what data is published in the
> whois database, because whois is easily and fully accessible by anyone
> in the world.
>
> Whois is all-or-nothing, you can't authenticate, you can't choose what
> to disclose, you can't exert any kind of access control, you can't
> even identify who queried it. it's PUBLIC!
>
> Whois is harvested and abused daily NOT for its intended purpose.
> That's why you see so many abuse@ noc@ registry@ email addresses!
>
> You want a list of addresses for your job? Fine, do it. sell it.
> keep it secret. We don't care.
> Whois is not the right place to FORCE someone to publish any kind of
> information if he doesn't want to.
> If you really want a legal address, there are more specialized and
> regulated databases for that. Cross referencing is not so hard.
> Unless you want to be sketchy and want to go around some restriction,
> there is no point to make whois worse.
>
> Regards,
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20181010/433b627b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20181010/433b627b/attachment.sig>