This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Feature request: publishing abstracts for accepted submissions for the RIPE events
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Feature request: publishing abstracts for accepted submissions for the RIPE events
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Feature request: publishing abstracts for accepted submissions for the RIPE events
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael J. Oghia
mike.oghia at gmail.com
Tue May 8 10:06:38 CEST 2018
Hi Artyom, I'm not sure why this thread hasn't gained any traction yet, but I think it's a good idea. I'm CCing Gergana from RIPE NCC External Relations so she can pass the suggestion along as well. Best, -Michael On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:20 AM, Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > During a call for papers for each meeting organized by RIPE NCC, a speaker > is expected to provide an abstract for each submission of a plenary talk. > These abstracts are then evaluated by the corresponding programme > committee. They serve a purpose of providing an outline of the > presentation, key points and topics covered in the talk. > > E.g. sometimes the title of a submission isn't in any way self-explanatory, > but the abstract helps the programme committee members to quickly get an > idea of what's going to be presented and whether it is relevant to the > interests of the community. > > However, these abstracts are not published together with the agenda, they > aren't even available in the mailing list -- though even that would be sort > of suboptimal in my opinion, but anyway -- they're just getting lost > forever. > > I believe it would be much appreciated by the audience if those abstracts > for accepted submissions are published on the Web site of a meeting > together with plenary agenda. A title itself often doesn't tell the > audience a lot about the content of the talk, while an abstract certainly > does. Say, once we had a submission for the ENOG meeting -- accepted later > for no less than an opening plenary session -- called "Operating a secure > network" -- go figure! > > NANOG meetings, APRICOT and other conferences do maintain a policy of > publishing this ahead of an event, along with the agenda. Maybe there's a > solid reason why NCC avoids doing that? I don't know, but I'll be glad to > figure out. > > Any opinions on this one? > > | Artyom Gavrichenkov > | gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191 > | mailto: ximaera at gmail.com > | fb: ximaera > | telegram: xima_era > | skype: xima_era > | tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20180508/7ed5ce05/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Feature request: publishing abstracts for accepted submissions for the RIPE events
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Feature request: publishing abstracts for accepted submissions for the RIPE events
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]