This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Sat Apr 28 13:46:51 CEST 2018
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:43:00PM +0000, Shane Kerr wrote: > tl;dr I think that we should have a RIPE archivist. > > More words: > > I was looking at some historical RIPE meeting records recently, and I > noticed that as we go further back in time the quality of records gets > worse. Formats are inconsistent, information is missing, and so on. Have you tried to contact relevant NCC department about missing information on the web page? [cut] > I think the RIPE NCC should hire someone to improve the records. This is a false dillema. That is why I do not agree with that. There are other means to achieve this goal than hiring someone by RIPE NCC. Piotr -- Piotr Strzyżewski Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]