[ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?

Hi,

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 01:20:07PM +0200, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote:
> I sympathize with this point of view. Saying that NCC should pay for
> something or hire someone to do something while we do have recurring
> discussion about member fees is imho at least careless.

I totally disagree with this view.  Someone will always complain that 
the fees are too high (and I might even agree with them, like, for a 
non-for-profit, the RIPE NCC member fees *are* high) - but using that
as an argument to stop any sort of investment does not lead anywhere
useful.

Of course we shouldn't be wasting money carelessly - but spending money
to improve what the NCC is there for (being a secretariat for the 
members' benefit) is not automatically "wasting money".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20180428/d900b177/attachment.sig>