[ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?

 I understand that  some of us are vary passionate about the RIPE "new
comers" and always are trying to help them in any possible way.

But I cannot see any reason why NCC members should pay for a ripe archivist
at this stage as the demand for digging old discussions is not really high,
and the outcome of having an archivist somehow is very limited.
(cost/benefit?)

Some volunteers can get involved for now and if later we could see a higher
demand or need more resources, we can always ask NCC for a RIPE archivist.

Regards,

Arash



>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:32:23PM +0430, Arash Naderpour wrote:
>> > -1,
>> >
>> > It doesn't make  sense to me at this stage.
>>
>> Why, exactly?  In Address-Policy, for example, many of the current
>> policies
>> go back to discussions we had years and years ago.  So having more easily
>> accessible archives of "old discussions" would help newcomers to
>> understand
>> better why things evolved the way they did...
>>
>> Gert Doering
>>         -- NetMaster
>> --
>> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>>
>> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
>> Emmer
>> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
>> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20180427/677e092c/attachment.html>