This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Apr 27 11:13:47 CEST 2018
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:32:23PM +0430, Arash Naderpour wrote:
> -1,
>
> It doesn't make sense to me at this stage.
Why, exactly? In Address-Policy, for example, many of the current policies
go back to discussions we had years and years ago. So having more easily
accessible archives of "old discussions" would help newcomers to understand
better why things evolved the way they did...
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20180427/4e96dd01/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]