This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Members-discuss complaints
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Members-discuss complaints
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Members-discuss complaints
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Wed Sep 6 12:20:21 CEST 2017
>> Is it still mandatory for each member to have one address subscribed to members-discuss? If so, does it need to be? :) > > Either I'm blind or this is not mandatory, at least by the Articles of > Association. Article 5 is probably the most important here. Well, I wasn't suggesting it was part of the AoA. Anyway, my choice of ‘mandatory’ was perhaps not the best word, I was referring to what I believe is an automatic subscription, so perhaps more accurately I should have asked if it’s possible to become a member without having an address added to members-discuss that then needs to be removed? Gert is correct when he observes that many members aren’t interested in the fact that the organisation they are members of is driven by them, whether it’s an IXP or an RIR. Cheers, Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Members-discuss complaints
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Members-discuss complaints
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]