This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] EU Data Protection
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC Services WG Chair re-election process
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] EU Data Protection
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Nov 5 17:20:30 CET 2014
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:03:15AM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette +wrote: >> I personally think that publishing "person" objects does +indeed break the >> law, NCC Legal clearly disagrees. > > It would seem so, and may God bless them for that. Actually, this is something I'd like to hear the "official" answer to, so let's ask the NCC: Having looked at some resources registered in the ripedb to natural persons and having found that the organisation: objects contain information such as full names, addresses and phone numbers, Assuming that this information is *required* to be there in order to be assigned independent resources, how does the uncontrolled publishing of that data possibly comply with the EU Data Protection Directive and imminent General Data Protection Regulation, especially considering the entirely uncontrolled transfer of such data to non-EU countries (whois lookups!)? IANAL, but to me it looks like a breach of said regulations. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC Services WG Chair re-election process
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] EU Data Protection
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]