This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Tue Aug 12 14:10:17 CEST 2014
I haven't made up my mind yet, although the forms-based approach has some beauty for us, as it provides a standardised framwork for collecting input from our customers/members. And while I certainly see the arguments from the NCC's end, I am wondering if it is really in the interst of the memebers and the RIR-LIR system at large, to save some money at the NCC and have all the members spend money individually to migrate to an API. Food for thought... Wilfried
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]