This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Tue Aug 5 20:08:56 CEST 2014
Hello, with each request submited over LIR portal, there's always generated filled form similar to form sent by email directly. So in general, LIR portal should be simple filled form generator (and there're not so many changes in the form in general) and all parsing can be done against form content, source independently. In general I think NCC has enough budged to support multiple input interfaces and keep *everyone* confortable, even some input method seems to be "legacy". And I don't think it's hard in this case. The "minority" using email interface is still large enough to support email requests. Also there should be some operational issues with portal/API interface and then is fine to have another way to submit request (even it's processed later), as traditional email can be easily queued... Even I'm using portal preferably for majority of changes, I would like to have fall-back option. With regards, Daniel On 5.8.2014 12:23, Ingrid Wijte wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > We are currently working to streamline the process around resource > requests, which is something that was asked for in the RIPE NCC Survey > 2013. As you will be aware, we offer request forms in the LIR Portal > in addition to the text-based email forms that are published in the > RIPE document store: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/current-ripe-documents/request-forms-supporting-notes > > > Maintaining two different systems for requests is inefficient, as it > requires duplicate work every time there is a policy change. More > importantly, the text-based email forms use legacy systems that take > engineering time from our staff to maintain. > > We contacted many LIRs who made requests using the text-based email > forms and in most cases they were using them out of habit or due to > specific workflows they had. Most said they would not mind to change > to the LIR Portal request forms, or adjust their workflows to use an > API. > > Today, most requests come via the LIR Portal rather than by email. > Since November 2013: > > - 95% of IPv6 allocations were issued after an LIR Portal form was > sent (909 out of 960) > - 91% of IPv4 allocations were requested via the LIR Portal (1,051 out > of 1,154) > - 75% of ASNs were requested via the LIR Portal (727 out of 975) > - From the 25% of ASNs requested via email, 50% of these requests > needed several iterations to pass the syntax checks > > Based on this feedback and the fact that a clear majority of members > are requesting resources through the LIR Portal, we would like to > propose the following: > > - The text-based email forms would be archived on 1 November 2014. > - We would continue to accept email requests until the end of December > 2014 to ensure that regular workflows are not disrupted. > - The RIPE NCC would offer an API for those members with specific > workflows that prevent them from using the request forms in the LIR > Portal. > - Text-based request forms that may be used by non-members (e.g. ENUM > requests) would remain on the website. > - To maintain transparency regarding the information needed to obtain > resources, the RIPE NCC would publish these procedures on > www.ripe.net. > > We are interested in your feedback on this proposal: > > - Do you agree with the general idea of phasing out text-based request > forms? > - What specific requirements would need to be addressed by the API? > - Would December 2014 be a suitable deadline to give you time to > adjust your systems and workflows? > > Please share your feedback on the RIPE NCC Services WG mailing list by > emailing <ncc-services-wg at ripe.net> before 1 October 2014. If you > would like to send us your technical requirements and/or concerns > confidentially, please email us at <requestforms at ripe.net> > > We will provide an update with a summary of the feedback received, > along with any next steps if the proposal is to go ahead. > > Looking forward to your input, > Best regards, > > Ingrid Wijte > Assistant Manager Registration Services > RIPE NCC > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Request for Feedback: Phasing Out Text-Based Email Request Forms
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]