[ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders

At Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:15:02 +0100,
Nigel Titley wrote:
> 
> Option 2.4, according to the proposal, is for those legacy holders who
> meet the criteria to engage with a sponsoring LIR "but cannot find a
> Sponsoring LIR with which a mutually satisfactory contract of the kind
> mentioned in that section". The board sees this option as being for
> legacy holders who are *unable* to find a sponsoring LIR rather than
> those who *do not want* to find a sponsoring LIR.

  I've noticed two things here.

  The more significant one is that we'll need to establish a common
  understanding of just what the distinction should be between
  *unable* and *do not want*.

  The other is that the passage cited is grammatically incomplete, as
  it is also in the on-line copy of ripe-605.  This is likely my
  responsibility as editor of the proposal.  I offer my apologies and
  will arrange to have it corrected.

  Best regards,
  Niall