This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Fri Apr 25 23:33:07 CEST 2014
On 25/04/14 15:48, Ulrich Schmid wrote: > Hi > > on 25.04.14 11:15 Nigel Titley wrote: >> First of all, the four options in the Charging Scheme regarding >> legacy space correspond directly to the four options (sections 2.1, >> 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4) in Policy Proposal 2012-07: >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-07 >> > From the Charging Scheme 2015: > - A separate charge of EUR 50 will apply for legacy Internet resources > that are registered via a sponsoring LIR. > > We have some Universities which got several /24 (C-classes) within a > more or less continuous address range. Currently they are registered as > single /24 ranges in the Ripe DB. > How will these legacy resources counted and/or will it be possible to > combine as much as possible /24 to one address range? > I imagine that the same principle used to count PI space would be used. And I see no reason for *not* being able to combine contiguous blocks into one resource. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Charges for legacy holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]