This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Tue Apr 22 13:10:41 CEST 2014
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:40:39AM +0100, Dave Wilson wrote: >The annual fee is the same, yes, but also in the 2015 charging >scheme: "Legacy Internet resource holders that become a member do not >have to pay a sign-up fee." So for the audience of 2012-07, becoming >a LIR is a flat one-off €2000 cheaper than a separate direct >agreement. At least it makes the intention clear - the NCC wants to gain control of these legacy resources (whereas the goal of 2012-07, AIUI, is to ensure a way to keep resources registered, without the holders giving up control). IMO this implementation negates many of the changes that came out of the long debate on this proposal... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]