This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Mon Apr 21 10:50:23 CEST 2014
Hi Sander, > If scrapping that option is the considered the right thing to do then > it should go through the policy development process and be removed > from the policies. For what it's worth, I brought up this exact issue during the PDP last year, but got no response. > The RIPE NCC members overruling RIPE policy here worries me a lot. I believe the easiest way to prevent that from happening would be to explain why the reason why the option exists in the first place. I would have no problem voting in favour of the changing the membership structure if I understood why the option exists, who would use it, how come they wouldn't prefer any of the other options offered by the policy, and so on. Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]