This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Wed Sep 11 22:50:44 CEST 2013
* Sergey Myasoedov wrote: > LIRs are not running networks with PI addressing LIRs may very well be running networks with PI addressing (I do!), so as a blanket statement, the above is false. For what it's worth, the reverse is also true: An LIR does not necessarily have anything to do with running the networks that are using PA addresses assigned by the LIR in question. However in this case, the LIR contact information are still clearly visible in the RIPE database (in the inet[6]num with status ALLOCATED PA). I see this proposal as bringing "parity" between PI and PA. Thus, +1. Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 Review Period extended until 1 October 2013 (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]