[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07

On 03/11/2013 13:06, Gert Doering wrote:
> From what I saw in the discussion, the main thing seems to be that Nick
> is assuming most LRHs are free-riders

The bias expressed in the term "free-riders" is not really appropriate for
this discussion.

When presented with multiple options which provide substantially the same
outcome, most organisations will take the simplest and easiest option.  In
this case, this option will be not to sign or pay anything.  This will not
represent a weakness on the part of the LRHs who decline to sign or pay.
It will simply be an acknowledgement that of all the options presented in
the proposal, it will be by far the easiest option to take and the end
result for the resource holder will be almost exactly the same.

Nick