This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Sun Nov 3 06:38:51 CET 2013
At 01:09 03/11/2013 +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: >This and the lack of quid-pro-quo are the two main reasons why this >proposal is critically flawed and why it should not become RIPE community >policy in its current form. > >Nick About 15 people stated their support for 2012-07 in this forum so for me as one of the authors I see this as consensus. Consensus does not mean everyone has to agree - just that most people need to agree. As I see it, most people agree. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]