This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Nov 1 19:16:04 CET 2013
Hi, Op 1 nov. 2013, om 19:06 heeft Nick Hilliard <nick at netability.ie> het volgende geschreven: >> Executive Summary >> - The RIPE NCC will contact all Legacy Resource Holders and offer them >> the options listed in the accepted policy. The total number of legacy >> Internet Resources in the RIPE Registry is approximately 4,200 IP >> blocks and 740 AS numbers, held by approximately 2,500 organisations. > > The cost of this will be highly dependent on the amount of work that the > RIPE NCC does here and it's not specified clearly in the impact analysis. The NCC has to contact all legacy resource holders, no matter what option they choose. What has this cost to do with the options presented to the legacy resource holders? > As there is no obligation on the RIPE NCC to establish a contractual > relationship with the end users for legacy holders, that part of the work > load will be less. On the other hand, the data is significantly more stale > than the organisations covered by 2007-01. True. > Has the NCC done any cost analysis for handling this proposal? That is for the NCC to answer. Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]