This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Nov 1 19:00:11 CET 2013
Hi, > I haven't seen the ripe ncc cost estimates for implementing 2012-07 yet. > The costs for 2007-01 were very high though. I know, but you are now comparing apples to oranges. The cost of 2007-01 was in establishing contractual relationships with all PI resource holders. We were talking about the cost of legacy resource holders that don't want to sign an agreement and maintain the status-quo. The RIPE NCC doesn't have to do much for those: keep the existing database objects and maybe keep the existing reverse DNS. Nothing else. The major effort will be for those that *do* enter into an agreement (validating their claim to the resources etc), but those will also contribute financially. Just like with 2007-01. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]