This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Nov 1 18:55:38 CET 2013
Hi, > It does indeed - the point wasn't lost on me. However the NCC membership > approved an NCC board proposal in Nov 2011 that it would no longer provide > this option, and now there is no such option available for PI holders. In > retrospect I think this is a more sensible way of handling the contractual > relationship. The RIPE community makes RIPE policy, and the NCC should implement it. Not the other way around... Now it might be wise for the community to listen to the NCC's advise about this, but this is not the place to change that. If people think this option should no longer be offered then that should be done with a separate policy proposal that changes it for all RIPE policies. Until that happens the same options should be offered everywhere to keep RIPE policy consistent. Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]