This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon May 20 18:55:46 CEST 2013
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:42:35PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: >If I read it correctly, the linked to argument is against RPKI as a >whole. However, 2013-04 isn't a question on whether we should do RPKI or >not, but whether or not our *existing* RPKI stuff should be extended to >include non-members. It's not against rpki as a whole but the implementation as it is. Which was, after 2008-08 failed to achieve consensus, brought in by (close) membership vote which raised some disquiet within the community at the time. It seems that the Board has decided to put this to the community for PI/Legacy space again, the idea is presumably that, if 2013-04 gains community backing, the same can then be done again for PA space since it would "merely harmonise policy". rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]