This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "PDPs should be renamed from YYYY-NN to RIPE-PDP-YYYY-NN-vN"
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "PDPs should be renamed from YYYY-NN to RIPE-PDP-YYYY-NN-vN"
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "All PDP emails, documents and websites should come with unified diff"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 01:00:49 CET 2013
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at netability.ie> wrote: > Does this need to be a policy? Could we not just ask the RIPE NCC kindly > to implement this rather than spending the next 6 months arguing, nodding > sagely or violently disagreeing about this? This is an operational detail; > nothing to do with policy. It's my understanding that this is the proper way to do it. Also, asking about this via various ways in the past didn't get me anywhere. I honestly don't care which way is chosen to achieve this as long as it's achieved. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "PDPs should be renamed from YYYY-NN to RIPE-PDP-YYYY-NN-vN"
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "All PDP emails, documents and websites should come with unified diff"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]