This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] defining consensus
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Divergence of RIPE / RIPE NCC policy
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Divergence of RIPE / RIPE NCC policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Mar 21 16:59:03 CET 2013
On 21 Mar 2013, at 12:28, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-resnick-on-consensus-02 >> Nice and useful document. Should be required reading for all >> WG-chairs. > > and participants +1 Pete's document is excellent. FWIW other organisations use a much more succinct definition of consensus: lack of sustained reasonable objection.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Divergence of RIPE / RIPE NCC policy
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Divergence of RIPE / RIPE NCC policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]