[ncc-services-wg] End User Agreement question

At 11:48 19/03/2013 +0100, Janos Zsako wrote:
>>In our context the End User wants us to "park" an ASN under our 
>>LIR.  Your interpretatio of "use" - "used to to identify a host" - does 
>>not cover the ASN instance.
>
>Therefore it is clear that an ASN is not intended to be used "internally", 
>moreover,
>you are not supposed to "park" it.

Obviously you did not understand what I meant by "park".  There are many 
resources out there - listed in the RIPE whois DB, actively being used, 
announced and routed on the Internet, but due to historical reasons, those 
resources are not listed under any LIR - they are just free hanging.  RIPE 
NCC has been sending out hundreds (thousands?) of emails to all those 
"hanging" resources (mainly historical ones) - informing them that the 
resource has to be listed under a LIR and if not, it will be revoked.  For 
lack of a better term, for a resource that exists, and is being used , and 
merely needs to be "assigned" to some LIR, I have used the term " to park".

Regards,
Hank