[ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "PDPs should be renamed from YYYY-NN to RIPE-PDP-YYYY-NN-vN"

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 03:20:31PM +0000, Alex Le Heux wrote:
> I think that overloading the name in such a way is only useful if both
> 2014-86-APWG and 2014-86-NCCSERVICES are possible. If the serial number of
> a proposal is unique across the different working groups, I don't see a
> need to include the WG in the name.

I find the proposal to be very good, and agree with Alex that no WG
should be included, if the serial number is unique anyway.

> Otherwise we should also consider including things like the name of the
> proposer, current stage of the PDP it is in, version, etc, etc :)

Don't forget shoe size. :)

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0