This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "All published documents and PDPs are maintained with git"
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "All published documents and PDPs are maintained with git"
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "All published documents and PDPs are maintained with git"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Fri Mar 15 22:24:10 CET 2013
* Sander Steffann >> All RIPE documents are made available by means of a git >> repository, both via anonymous pull and via a web interface. The >> read-only access is open to everyone, RIPE member or not. Within >> RIPE, this git repository is the canonical place for all published >> documents. All published documents are copied from it. > > I don't know how useful this is, as RIPE documents don't change once > they are published. If a revision of a RIPE document is published it > gets a new number. So I don't think a version control system will be > useful here. I can see one particular advantage of using a version control system - the "git blame" command, which will show when a particular sentence or paragraph was added or last modified. There's several times I've read RIPE documents and wondered along the lines of: «Where did this come from? What was the rationale behind it?» I rarely go through the trouble to find out. That said, while I agree that Git is a very good tool, I'm reluctant to micro-manage the NCC by saying «you MUST use Git» (or any other particular tool for that matter). The current system can be improved a whole lot without requiring a version control system, I like to point to the IETF's tools page, which shows all the revisions of a draft leading up to its publication as RFC, and where you can generate both in-line and side-by-side diffs on the fly. One example: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-09 In any case, for maximum use of any form of version control system, you'd have to consider that even though e.g. ripe-582 is a new version of ripe-577 which in turn is a new version of ripe-553 and so on, the history of ripe-582 alone isn't nearly as interesting as the history of ripe-582 plus all preceding versions combined. So either the file name needs to stay the same between versions (unlike today). or you'd have to import the entire history of the previous version into whatever you're starting the PDP with for the proposed new version. I don't know if Git allows for this. -- Tore Anderson
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "All published documents and PDPs are maintained with git"
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "All published documents and PDPs are maintained with git"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]