[ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members

Виталий Туровец wrote:

> I must admit that i myself as PI holder and service operator completely
> agree with Dan and think that RPKI certification should be somehow
> achievable by PI holders themselves without need to do any kinds of
> requests to LIR.

So it seems you are meking a cse for a direct service relationship with
the NCC, and not using the concept of the "Sponsoring LIR"?

Wilfried.

> 2013/6/10 Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com <mailto:maildanrl at gmail.com>>
> 
>     > As you may have seen, I’ve created a policy proposal to ask the
>     RIPE NCC to
>     > allow Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC member resource
>     holders. (IXP
>     > / Legacy space and PI space holders)
> 
>     As a PI holder and a router operator I support this proposal. I want
>     others be able to verify my prefixes.
> 
>     RPKI, if used widely, can be a much more acurate source for routing
>     information than the databases are. Even in RIPE region, where the
>     database tends to be well maintained. The more resource holders are
>     allowed to use RPKI, the better. I would even pay a fee for the
>     signing process of my resources, just in case this is about money.
> -- 
[...]
> ~~~
> WBR,
> Vitaliy Turovets
> NOC Lead @TV-Net ISP
> +38(093)265-70-55
> VITU-RIPE
> X-NCC-RegID: ua.tv <http://ua.tv>