This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
ebais at a2b-internet.com
Mon Jun 10 11:30:46 CEST 2013
Hi, First of all, sorry for being a bit late to jump in on the proposal. https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-07/draft I had a question on the procedures, when this proposal is accepted. Is it the intention of the RIPE NCC to go back to ALL legacy resource holders (including those that have signed the 'Legacy Space Agreement' or 'Agreement between Legacy Holder and LIR' ( see the downloads of the templates here : http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/legacy-space ) to ask them if they would want to revert their decision and get their original LEGACY status back on their resources under this policy instead of the status: Allocated PA or Assigned PI? The reason why I ask this, as there might be original Legacy space holders who might think that the current proposal would be a better solution (fit) than the current implemented (signed) agreement. I noticed point 10 in the Executive Summary: 10. If the proposal is accepted, the RIPE NCC will have to contact Legacy Resource Holders that have their resources registered under the umbrella of an LIR and offer them the contractual options of the accepted proposal. The RIPE NCC will consider any requests for this since 1992 as having never been submitted. But does that include ALL Legacy resource holders even those that are not registered under a LIR? One of the other (small) points that I had some questions about is point 2 in the Executive summary: 2. The RIPE NCC often receives requests from Legacy Resource Holders wanting their resources to be considered as space allocated by the RIPE NCC. If this proposal is accepted, the RIPE NCC will have to decline these requests. Why would the RIPE NCC have to decline these requests? I also have a question on the topic A Understanding the policy: This policy proposal is meant to be applied by the RIPE NCC to Registration Services, as regards Legacy Internet Resources. > Legacy Internet Resources – as defined in this proposal, are any Internet resources obtained prior to (or otherwise outside of) the current system of hierarchical distribution (by allocation or assignment) through the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs). While this definition is not limited to resources in the RIPE Registry, the RIPE NCC does not have authority over Legacy Internet Resources in other registries. If this proposal is accepted, the RIPE NCC will implement it only to Legacy Internet Resources that are currently registered in the RIPE Registry. If there are Legacy Internet Resources currently registered at ARIN for instance and a legitimate holder wants to have their resource registered in the RIPE registry, why would it not be available for those registrations? Regards, Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]