This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Jun 6 16:26:24 CEST 2013
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:54:44PM +1000, Jen Linkova wrote: > >I support the proposal. Situation when 'all IP addresses are equal, >but some addresses are more equal than others' does not make much >sense to me. Right now, there is no policy that allows for *any* resources to be (NCC-) signed. If this proposal passes, there will be a situation where there is a policy for PI/Legacy resources and *no policy* for PA resources. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [address-policy-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]