[ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)

I agree with Tore and Erik, enable all resources that are maintained
within the region of RIPE not matter what the status of them are so +1.

// Andreas
Med vänlig hälsning
Andreas Larsen
 
IP-Only Telecommunication AB| Postadress: 753 81 UPPSALA | Besöksadress:
S:t Persgatan 6, Uppsala |
Telefon: +46 (0)18 843 10 00 | Direkt: +46 (0)18 843 10 56
www.ip-only.se






Den 2013-06-04 09:28 skrev Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no>:

>* Erik Bais
>
>>> I've got one question though. What is the rationale for the requirement
>>> that «the Internet resources reside within the RIPE NCC service
>>>region»?
>>> I don't see the reason for this. IMHO, any PI/legacy space
>>> issued/maintained by the RIPE NCC should be eligible for certification
>>> under this policy, no matter where on (or off!) the planet it's being
>> used.
>> 
>> The intention is to provide the services for end-users / organizations
>> within the RIPE NCC service region.
>> That the resources itself are used outside the region can't and I think
>>we
>> shouldn't want to restrict.
>> 
>> I'll see how to rephrase that before the review.
>
>IMHO we should not restrict this to end users / organisations within the
>RIPE NCC service region, as it is legitimate for organisations located
>outside of the NCC's service region to hold address space registered in
>the RIPE NCC's registry.
>
>I think the natural scope of this policy would be all resources that are
>maintained in in the RIPE NCC's registry.
>
>So how about simply «The Internet resources reside within the RIPE NCC
>registry»?
>
>Tore
>