This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Mon Feb 25 11:48:16 CET 2013
At 10:56 25/02/2013 +0100, Daniel Stolpe wrote: >Yes. And when the owners want an update they may be locked in the process >och showing that they are in fact the right owners. We have a customer, a >large corporate group that everybody in my country knows about and I would >even say most people would agree that the original owner of a /16 is now >part of this group and ask no further questions but what documentation is >there now from a merger in 2000? Exactly because of the complexity, the NCC should require payment for registration services to handle the request. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]