[ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:28:30AM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 25/02/2013 10:21, Gert Doering wrote:
> > If everything works, why would they need to even think about it?
> 
> e.g. to provide a credible means of rescue in the case of registry
> hijacking?  A /16 isn't a ?9.99 kettle which you can easily replace down in
> the local hardware shop.
> 
> > So I'm not sure why a PI /16 holder would have more need for updates,
> > if nothing changed...
> 
> The whole point is that something has changed in the situation that Daniel
> referred to: the legal name of the resource holder.

Sure.  

But still, "if it all works, why would they even remember that the 
RIPE NCC exists"?  The human brain works like that...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20130225/02fb4343/attachment.sig>