This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Sat Feb 16 13:47:45 CET 2013
Hi Sascha, > How would you feel if the cops published lists like: > > -Sander Stefann > -complaint for kiddiepr0n > -anonymous submitter > -being investigated ? > > That sort of stuff sticks and never goes away even if it is subsequently > found to be bullshit. Sorry, but you are pulling this whole discussion out of context and proportion. > Nope, no way, not unless a violation is determined - akin to being found > guilty in a court of law. > > Also, the identity of the submitter MUST be published even in this case. > No anonymity for snitches, the Stasi wasn't *that* long ago Ok, and this even more so. I am ending this thread right now. Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]