[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)

Randy,

am Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 06:01:25PM -0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> i would suggest that there is a non-trivial number of lrhs who would be
> happy to form a more formal bond with the ncc to ensure their data are
> correct, and quite willing to pay a modest fee for the services
> currently provided for free.  they just don't want to come under address
> policies and rights reduction of ncc membership.

I think the biggest fear that we have when registering our legacy resources
with RIPE is, that the billing scheme might change considerably, counting our
legacy assignments in full. We're a LIR already, too. But that's what Sascha
called the "trap", I guess.

On the other hand I think many people agree that address policies do not apply
to legacy resources. Putting this into a policy makes sense to me, even though
I'm aware that future generations of policy makers might change it again. ;-)


Kind regards
Philipp Kern