This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Wed Feb 6 19:48:19 CET 2013
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:36:08PM +0100, Wilfried Woeber wrote: > Thus I do not consider continuation of providing a (proportionally really > cheep) service for them as "irresponsible". Actually this same service has > been offered for more than 20 years and the community didn't scream :-) +1 While I would support the spirit that any resource holder is encouraged to contribute, I do not see this policy making body in a position to retroactively force an "LRH" under any (new) policy. The NCC, when founded, was well aware of "LRHs" when it accepted its mission, thus inheriting the duties of contractual (express or implied) delivery towards those "LRHs". -Peter (not really an LRH)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]