[ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2

On 04/02/2013 22:12, Måns Nilsson wrote:
> The "completely estranged LRH holder organisation" is not that common, I
> believe. Wasting electrons on this corner case is not fruitful.

Problem is, I'm not sure it's a corner case; nor am I sure that the
squatters are corner cases, nor the abandoned address blocks.

Has the RIPE NCC done any preliminary analysis of the ERX space in terms of:

- rough consistency of link between inetnum: owner and mntner
- when was the last time the resources were updated
- potential LIR association
- whether prefix is visible in dfz

I realise that this is very ill-specified.

This might be useful in quantifying how much effort it would be worth
expending in what you and Hank refer to as "corner cases", but which I
would feel were more common.

Nick