This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Feb 6 07:34:09 CET 2013
> Suppose we have 100 corner cases and they each own a /19. They have an > auto-num, route and inetnum objects which is controlled by a mntner > object. They send in an email to auto-dbm at ripe.net to update some phone > number or email in order to keep the whois data uptodate. In my opinion, > this is the only registry service they need and these 100 corner cases > should be allowed to continue to do so. If they need something that > requires human intervention - "anything", which can include a lost MD5 > password for their mntner, then, at that point the RIPE NCC can state "pay > membership dues in order for us to continue". s/memebrship dues/fees for the services/ randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]