This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Wed Feb 6 06:55:13 CET 2013
At 01:31 06/02/2013 +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: >Removal of registration as a long term prospect: this will be necessary. >There is undoubtedly a pile of ERX address space which is either squatted >or abandoned. As a long term objective, I think that there is some duty of >stewardship that makes de-registration of data a requirement. Maybe we >don't need to deal with it in 2012-07, but it is inevitable on a 20-50 year >basis. I agree. If the inetnum or autnum is unused and not routed for the past 5 years, and all attempts at contact via email to the data listed in whois, then by all means, initiate some sort of squatting/abandoned project. But this has nothing to do with LRH, but should be a RIR policy. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]