This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Tue Feb 5 16:46:36 CET 2013
On 5 Feb 2013, at 15:16, Nick Hilliard wrote: > fwiw, i found this quite ambiguous too. It took several careful scans over > the doc to figure out the intention. Some wordsmithing here would be quite > beneficial. Version 1 attracted criticism for (among other things!) mixing policy and motivation. I took the message that the policy itself should be as bare as possible, and that the motivation belonged in the discussion on this list. I brought this message to the process of drafting version 2, and pushed the "less is more" notion to the other co-authors. If I've taken this idea further than necessary, I'm sorry. /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]