[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)

> Coming back after stating my general support yesterday, to one of the
> individual issues that may benefit from changes:
> 
> I don't remember who already pointed fingers at the ROA service
> (thanks!), but we - eventually - may have a pretty convincing carrot
> by offering the "Certification of these data;" (which I read as being
> ROA and future friends) only to LHRs that have established a formal
> relationship and are paying for the service according to 2.1 ... 2.4.
> 
> Certification is a service that has been developed recently by the
> RIRs, so IMO there is no legacy "right" here. This would apply for the
> cases described in 2.5 and certainly 2.6.

< as one of the proposers >

this carrot is not accidental.  your first paragraph would seem to
indicate that you would prefer to dilute this encouragement to form
a formal relationship?  am i misreading?

randy