[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)

On 4 Feb 2013, at 14:18, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> If you're going to propose a policy which gives carte blanche to LRHs never
> to pay a penny for all eternity in return for reliable registration
> services

	I don't believe I am.

	You seem to be making a different reading of the proposal from
	the one I'm making.

	I've tried to address your objections to the proposed sections
	2.4 and 2.5.  Have I misunderstood what you meant?

	Have I perhaps left your "carte blanche" interpretation 
	un-addressed because I've assumed it was derived from section 2.5?

	Is there something else I'm missing?

	ATB
	/Niall