This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Finalising 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Mon Feb 4 14:52:14 CET 2013
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:21:15PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: > I don't see any basis upon which to attempt to impose RIPE resource > management policy on legacy resources, but payment for services received is > fundamental. I'm not sure I can recognize the difference between the two. Unless the NCC or anybody else can demonstrate caveats attached to the early assignments and still given the continuation of the service as implied action, how do you think any group decision could tangibly bring an entity under the umbrella of the PDP that had an implied contract before that time? What is the net gain expected compared to the legal and financial risk? -Peter (as always, expressing his personal opinion)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Finalising 2012-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]